Log in

No account? Create an account

May 2019



Powered by LiveJournal.com

The Woman in White, Wilkie Collins: the book and the series

This was supposed to be part of my ‘April books’ post (as yet unfinished) but turned out so long, I thought it had better have a post of its own.

Jessie Buckley as Marian. Photo Radio Times.

When the TV series began, I decided to re-read The Woman in White. I soon found that I hadn’t read it before but knew the story from an excellent radio dramatisation heard years ago. The introduction to my (Daily Express!) 1930s copy, states that Thackeray sat up all night to finish the book. I didn’t match that feat but did romp through its 500+ pages very quickly indeed. It tells the story of two half-sisters, Laura Fairlie and Marian Halcombe, living in a remote country house with their selfish uncle. Laura has a fortune; Marian, none. It was the dying wish of Laura’s father that she should marry Sir Percival Glyde. Why? I find this a weak point in the novel. A young drawing master, Walter Hartwright, is hired to teach the girls sketching. He has previously had a strange encounter on Hampstead Heath with a wild young woman who claims to have been wrongly put away in a lunatic asylum and begs for his help in escaping, which he gives. She is Anne Catherick, the eponymous Woman in White, who loathes and fears Glyde.

Laura and Walter are attracted to each other but her loyalty to her dead father is such that she resolves to go through with the marriage to a man she doesn’t love. Things get really interesting when Glyde’s friend Count Fosco appears on the scene. He’s a wonderful, larger than life figure (literally; he’s described as grossly corpulent), with his devotion to his pet birds and mice, his love of music and all things beautiful, his knowledge of chemistry and his wickedness. Glyde is a pantomime villain, a very stupid man, while Fosco is all brains and guile. Their plan, of course, is to get their hands on Laura’s money. Anne Catherick tries to warn Laura against Glyde; she’s forever flitting about in churchyards and crumbling boathouses uttering sibylline but incoherent warnings. This adds to the gothic feeling of the novel, as does the isolation of the two young women in Glyde’s gloomy house.

Here is the time to say that Laura is rather an Amelia, a pale and spineless cipher for put-upon womanhood. Marian, in contrast, is intelligent, strong willed, sharp and tough. Count Fosco genuinely admires her virtues but why Walter would look at Laura rather than extraordinary Marian is a mystery about men’s tastes. The book races to its conclusion with many a twist and turn. You might think it a feminist work because of its depiction of the powerlessness of women, yet after some melodrama things end conventionally enough.

Collins used multiple narrators to tell his tale, which makes adaptation difficult. The great mystery about the TV version is not, ‘what is Glyde’s terrible secret?’ but how it is possible to turn such a cracking read into something so slow, boring and lacking in menace? Then there are the historical inaccuracies. The book was published in 1859 yet Laura looks half the time as if dressed in a regency nightie, while wonderful Marian wears clothes so eccentric for the date (she looks great!) that you wouldn’t turn a hair if you saw her walking down your high street tomorrow. Very disappointing so far.


I have to agree with your summing up thus far. I am a little disappointed in the TV adaptation as I expected a little more of the Gothic. I get Walter falling for Laura; he's a kind man and seems the type to be drawn to a damsel in distress. Marian would be far too much for his personality to handle. I have wondered at Laura's limited wardrobe, I suppose the white nightie look is symbolic in some way with poor wandering and tormented Anne. I also rather like Marian's eccentric attire :) I can't quite put my finger on why it all seems to be missing something.
Glad it's not just me. Your mention of Walter reminds me that a young man would *never* have appeared in shirtsleeves, as he does, before young ladies. It was as bad as stripping! And in the book, Marian says. 'I'll fetch my bonnet', when they're only going for a walk in the park. These things grate on me. The worst fault, IMO is that it's not frightening enough. Perhaps that will come in the last two episodes.

The Woman in White

The only good TV version of the novel is the one made in 1982 with Alan Badel as Count Fosco and Diana Quick as Marian. I assume you have seen it, if not do so immediately. None of the TV versions since have been any good.

Re: The Woman in White

I don't remember the 1982 version but I didn't watch much television in those days. Thanks for reminding me of Alan Badel; what a loss he was.
How funny, you once (almost 10 years ago!) wrote a comment in my LJ that you always get the urge to read this in January :-D

I still haven't read the book, but I didn't like the series at all (apart from Marian). So melodramatic and not the least bit scary. Rather put me off the book, but as you say it's a cracking read I will just forget about the TV series.

Edited at 2018-05-12 09:11 pm (UTC)
Oh dear, better put it down to age :-) It's true that I want to get stuck into a Victorian novel at that time of year.

Everyone seems to have found the TV series disappointing.